<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BV Source &#124; Pittsburgh Family Lawyer &#124; 2010 Super Lawyer &#187; tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bvsource.com/category/divorce/tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bvsource.com</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Family Lawyer Experienced in Resolving Divorce, Child Support, Marital Property, Alimony &#124; Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alimony Tax Gross-Up Approved</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/alimony-tax-gross-up-approved/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=alimony-tax-gross-up-approved</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/alimony-tax-gross-up-approved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross-up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Balicki v. Balicki, 2010 PA Super. 134 (July 30, 2010), the Superior Court considered the husband&#8217;s argument that the alimony order provided more income to his ex-wife than she could spend (as shown by her budgetary expenses). The trial court in its opinion justified the alimony award by noting that the wife would pay [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/alimony-tax-gross-up-approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dividing CRATs and CRUTs in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/dividing-crats-and-cruts-in-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=dividing-crats-and-cruts-in-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/dividing-crats-and-cruts-in-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recently-issued IRS ruling (Rev.Rul.2008-41) addressed the issue of whether a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) or charitable remander unitrust (CRUT) can be divided into two equal trusts upon divorce. A charitable remainder annuity trust is a trust in which the grantor receives income in the form of an annuity payment until his or her [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/dividing-crats-and-cruts-in-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Legal Fees: Tax Deductible?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-legal-fees-tax-deductible/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=divorce-legal-fees-tax-deductible</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-legal-fees-tax-deductible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deductibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time each year, divorce lawyers everywhere face the same question from clients: are my legal fees are tax-deductible? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-legal-fees-tax-deductible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SRR Answers &#8220;Taxing&#8221; Year-End Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/srr-answers-taxing-year-end-questions/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=srr-answers-taxing-year-end-questions</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/srr-answers-taxing-year-end-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bvsource.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The forensic accounting firm of Stout Risius Ross Advisors LLC has published an excellent guide to year-end tax questions that separated and divorcing spouses may have: 1.) What is my filing status for 2008? Your filing status is determined as of the last day of the calendar year. You are considered unmarried for the whole [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/srr-answers-taxing-year-end-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
