<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BV Source &#124; Pittsburgh Family Lawyer &#124; 2010 Super Lawyer &#187; marital property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bvsource.com/category/divorce/marital-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bvsource.com</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Family Lawyer Experienced in Resolving Divorce, Child Support, Marital Property, Alimony &#124; Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Possession of Marital Residence</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/exclusive-possession-of-marital-residence/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=exclusive-possession-of-marital-residence</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/exclusive-possession-of-marital-residence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premarital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A thorny issue that arises early in many divorce proceedings is the question of who may live in the marital residence during the separation period. Generally speaking, the courts will not evict either spouse from the marital residence during separation if they are living together peacefully and have not voluntarily moved away. This principle leads some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/exclusive-possession-of-marital-residence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How is Marital Property Different from Community Property?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/how-is-marital-property-different-from-community-property/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=how-is-marital-property-different-from-community-property</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/how-is-marital-property-different-from-community-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Pennsylvania, marital property is divided in a process known as equitable distribution. The method prescribed by the Divorce Code is a &#8220;dual classification&#8221; equitable distribution scheme because marital property is distinguished from nonmarital or separate property (terms which are used interchangeably). In other jurisdictions governed by an &#8220;all-property&#8221; equitable distribution scheme, the divorce courts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/how-is-marital-property-different-from-community-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Not Let Divorce Dissolve Your Family Business</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/do-not-let-divorce-dissolve-your-family-business/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=do-not-let-divorce-dissolve-your-family-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/do-not-let-divorce-dissolve-your-family-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenuptial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employ legal tactics and structures to prevent a divorce from deadlocking the business. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/do-not-let-divorce-dissolve-your-family-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair Value Standard Rejected by Colorado Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketability discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This decision contains a good explanation of the reasons why "fair value" is not necessarily appropriate to divorce cases.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy-Sell Controls Value of Medical Practice in Texas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy-sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas has once again proven itself to be a haven for the affluent divorcee. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; Business Valuation in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/new-business-valuation-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-business-valuation-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/new-business-valuation-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalization rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two articles from BV Wire recently caught my attention. Both deal with business valuation in divorce cases where personal goodwill was an issue. I will post my own analysis soon. Meanwhile, here are excerpts from BV Wire&#8217;s blast email, published by BV Resources. Med practice valuations still plague appraisers—and the courts A trio of new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/new-business-valuation-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Assets in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/hidden-assets-in-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hidden-assets-in-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/hidden-assets-in-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The South Carolina Family Law Blog contains a great list of frequently-overlooked or hidden assets in divorce.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/hidden-assets-in-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania: Alimony Factors</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/pennsylvania-alimony-factors/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=pennsylvania-alimony-factors</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/pennsylvania-alimony-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The value of a spouse's share of marital property and the income it generates, the income and earning capacity of each spouse, and the reasonable budgetary needs - these factors remain the most influential in Pennsylvania alimony cases.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/pennsylvania-alimony-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perhaps They Could be Divided 50%-50%</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/breast-implant-marital-property/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=breast-implant-marital-property</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/breast-implant-marital-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of North Dakota has been asked to decide whether breast implants should be identified as marital property and valued for divorce purposes.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/breast-implant-marital-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectively Waiving Retirement Benefits in a Settlement Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qdro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the statewide broadcast of PBI's Family Law Update today, my colleague David Ladov asked me to post the features that a marital settlement agreement would have to contain in order to qualify as a QDRO (qualified domestic relations order). A QDRO is one of two possible ways that someone may waive his or her right to receive a share of his or her ex-spouse's retirement benefits (the other being a beneficiary designation form). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
