<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BV Source &#124; Pittsburgh Family Lawyer &#124; 2010 Super Lawyer &#187; family court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bvsource.com/category/decisions/family-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bvsource.com</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Family Lawyer Experienced in Resolving Divorce, Child Support, Marital Property, Alimony &#124; Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fair Value Standard Rejected by Colorado Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketability discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This decision contains a good explanation of the reasons why "fair value" is not necessarily appropriate to divorce cases.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/fair-value-standard-rejected-by-colorado-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy-Sell Controls Value of Medical Practice in Texas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy-sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas has once again proven itself to be a haven for the affluent divorcee. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another State Stops Child Support for College Students</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/child-support-for-college-students/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=child-support-for-college-students</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/child-support-for-college-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law may not treat separated or divorced parents differently than married parents, who have no legal obligation to pay their children's college tuition.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/child-support-for-college-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constructive Notice is Sufficient in Child Support Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Murphy v. Murphy, a recent Superior Court decision, the father appealed a support order entered in absentia because he claimed that he never received notice of the June 2008 support hearing. The father argued that the notice mailed to him was too late (less than 20 days before the hearing, contrary to Rule 1910.6) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premature Termination of Child Support Reversed, Affirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recent Superior Court decision, Castadi v. Castaldi, the Domestic Relations Section mailed notices to the child&#8217;s mother inquiring whether child support should terminate in January 2007, when the child would be eighteen years old. Mother did not respond to the inquiries, and the Domestic Relations Section terminated child support. Unbeknownst to the DRS, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; Business Valuation in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/new-business-valuation-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-business-valuation-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/new-business-valuation-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalization rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two articles from BV Wire recently caught my attention. Both deal with business valuation in divorce cases where personal goodwill was an issue. I will post my own analysis soon. Meanwhile, here are excerpts from BV Wire&#8217;s blast email, published by BV Resources. Med practice valuations still plague appraisers—and the courts A trio of new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/new-business-valuation-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Court&#8217;s Power to Regulate Business</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[receiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bvsource.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An issue that befuddles some business owners during the course of their divorce litigation is how to regulate the operation and management of their businesses. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Most Important Child Support Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For each of the past four years, I have been privileged to teach lawyers about the latest developments in child support as one of the hosts of Family Law Update, a satellite broadcast presentation sponsored by the Pennsyvlania Bar Institute. Since I joined the panel in 2005, several important decisions have influenced the direction of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Assets in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/hidden-assets-in-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hidden-assets-in-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/hidden-assets-in-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The South Carolina Family Law Blog contains a great list of frequently-overlooked or hidden assets in divorce.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/hidden-assets-in-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New PA Child Support Guidelines: Cause for Modification</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Guideline amount resulting from new or revised support guidelines may constitute a material and substantial change in circumstances.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
