<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BV Source &#124; Pittsburgh Family Lawyer &#124; 2010 Super Lawyer &#187; children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bvsource.com/category/children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bvsource.com</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Family Lawyer Experienced in Resolving Divorce, Child Support, Marital Property, Alimony &#124; Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>International Child Support and Custody Disputes</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/international-child-support-and-custody-disputes/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=international-child-support-and-custody-disputes</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/international-child-support-and-custody-disputes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the ABA Journal this month focuses attention on the growing problem of international child support and custody disputes. With the advent of global travel and internet relationships, more and more parents are facing the challenge of enforcing child support and custody orders across national boundaries. Some parents describe experiences that sound like scenes from a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/international-child-support-and-custody-disputes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott Dissent: Opposing View on Hague Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Stevens wrote that the non-relocation order was merely a restriction on the mother's custody rights, not "rights of custody" that would justify the more stringent remedy under the Hague Convention. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Rules on International Custody Case: Child Removed in Violation of Non-Relocation Order Must be Returned</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the international child custody treaty (the Hague Convention) requires the return of a child who was removed in violation of a non-relocation order.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should You Prepare for Custody Mediation?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allegheny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gosselin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon and Kate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jon and Kate divorce provided another example this week of what not to do.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another State Stops Child Support for College Students</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/child-support-for-college-students/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=child-support-for-college-students</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/child-support-for-college-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law may not treat separated or divorced parents differently than married parents, who have no legal obligation to pay their children's college tuition.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/child-support-for-college-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constructive Notice is Sufficient in Child Support Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Murphy v. Murphy, a recent Superior Court decision, the father appealed a support order entered in absentia because he claimed that he never received notice of the June 2008 support hearing. The father argued that the notice mailed to him was too late (less than 20 days before the hearing, contrary to Rule 1910.6) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/constructive-notice-is-sufficient-in-child-support-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premature Termination of Child Support Reversed, Affirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recent Superior Court decision, Castadi v. Castaldi, the Domestic Relations Section mailed notices to the child&#8217;s mother inquiring whether child support should terminate in January 2007, when the child would be eighteen years old. Mother did not respond to the inquiries, and the Domestic Relations Section terminated child support. Unbeknownst to the DRS, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/premature-termination-of-child-support-reversed-affirmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Most Important Child Support Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For each of the past four years, I have been privileged to teach lawyers about the latest developments in child support as one of the hosts of Family Law Update, a satellite broadcast presentation sponsored by the Pennsyvlania Bar Institute. Since I joined the panel in 2005, several important decisions have influenced the direction of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/six-most-important-pa-child-support-cases-since-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New PA Child Support Guidelines: Cause for Modification</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Guideline amount resulting from new or revised support guidelines may constitute a material and substantial change in circumstances.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines-cause-for-modification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New PA Child Support Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-pa-child-support-guidelines</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania child support guidelines have been extended upward to $30,000 per month combined net income, and the Melzer formula has been eliminated in high-income cases. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/new-pa-child-support-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
