<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BV Source &#124; Pittsburgh Family Lawyer &#124; 2010 Super Lawyer &#187; custody</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bvsource.com/category/children/custody/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bvsource.com</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Family Lawyer Experienced in Resolving Divorce, Child Support, Marital Property, Alimony &#124; Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott Dissent: Opposing View on Hague Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Stevens wrote that the non-relocation order was merely a restriction on the mother's custody rights, not "rights of custody" that would justify the more stringent remedy under the Hague Convention. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/abbott-dissent-opposing-view-on-hague-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Rules on International Custody Case: Child Removed in Violation of Non-Relocation Order Must be Returned</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the international child custody treaty (the Hague Convention) requires the return of a child who was removed in violation of a non-relocation order.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/scotus-rules-on-international-custody-case-child-removed-in-violation-of-non-relocation-order-must-be-returned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should You Prepare for Custody Mediation?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allegheny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gosselin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon and Kate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jon and Kate divorce provided another example this week of what not to do.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/should-you-prepare-for-custody-mediation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Father&#8217;s Rights: Growing Trend in Custody?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/fathers-rights-growing-trend-custody/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=fathers-rights-growing-trend-custody</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/fathers-rights-growing-trend-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[father's rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A series of articles published last month in Working Mother magazine claims that men who seek custody of their children in contested divorces are winning just as often as women. This trend is attributed to the principle that parents who work harder to provide for the family have less time and ability to perform traditional [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/fathers-rights-growing-trend-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Private School Better than Public, and Who Pays?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/private-school-tuition-murphy-mcdermott/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=private-school-tuition-murphy-mcdermott</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/private-school-tuition-murphy-mcdermott/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracurricular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private school]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Superior Court held that it would not overrule the trial court's finding that parochial school would benefit the child, nor its finding that Father could afford the expense. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/private-school-tuition-murphy-mcdermott/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
