<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BV Source &#124; Pittsburgh Family Lawyer &#124; 2010 Super Lawyer &#187; agreements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bvsource.com/category/agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bvsource.com</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Family Lawyer Experienced in Resolving Divorce, Child Support, Marital Property, Alimony &#124; Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, SuperLawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Buy-Sell Controls Value of Medical Practice in Texas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy-sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas has once again proven itself to be a haven for the affluent divorcee. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-medical-practice-texas-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Really Needs a Cohabitation Agreement?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/needcohabitation-agreement/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=needcohabitation-agreement</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/needcohabitation-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I considered the provisions of the agreement in light of recent development in the law, I started to think: Who really needs a cohabitation agreement anyway? Four categories came to mind]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/needcohabitation-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA Today Says Prenups are &#8220;In&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/usa-today-prenups/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=usa-today-prenups</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/usa-today-prenups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenuptial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premarital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article published recently in USA Today reports that prenuptial agreements are more acceptable today to couples who are engaged than at any time in the past. Nearly one-third of single adults say they would ask a significant other to sign a prenup, according to a February survey of 2,323 adults by Harris Interactive.  Only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/usa-today-prenups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Court&#8217;s Power to Regulate Business</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[receiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bvsource.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An issue that befuddles some business owners during the course of their divorce litigation is how to regulate the operation and management of their businesses. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/divorce-courts-power-to-regulate-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Woods Elin Nordegren Renegotiating Prenup? Why?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/tiger-woods-elin-nordegren-renegotiating-prenup-why/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=tiger-woods-elin-nordegren-renegotiating-prenup-why</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/tiger-woods-elin-nordegren-renegotiating-prenup-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenuptial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nordegren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premarital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By letting the media firestorm subside, Woods might be able to preserve his valuable sponsorships, at least for a while. Given the stakes, wouldn't it make sense to throw a little money her way?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/tiger-woods-elin-nordegren-renegotiating-prenup-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parent Held Not Liable under &#8220;Verbal Agreement&#8221; to Pay College Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/parent-liable-verbal-agreement-college-expenses/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=parent-liable-verbal-agreement-college-expenses</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/parent-liable-verbal-agreement-college-expenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Mackay v. Mackay (2009), a parent attempted to enforce a casual conversation about college plans for their young children as a "verbal agreement" to pay college expenses. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/parent-liable-verbal-agreement-college-expenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectively Waiving Retirement Benefits in a Settlement Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qdro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the statewide broadcast of PBI's Family Law Update today, my colleague David Ladov asked me to post the features that a marital settlement agreement would have to contain in order to qualify as a QDRO (qualified domestic relations order). A QDRO is one of two possible ways that someone may waive his or her right to receive a share of his or her ex-spouse's retirement benefits (the other being a beneficiary designation form). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/effectively-waiving-retirement-benefits-in-a-settlement-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy-Sell Held Controlling Where Wife Signed</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-held-controlling-wife-signed/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=buy-sell-held-controlling-wife-signed</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-held-controlling-wife-signed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy-sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[franchise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A business owner's spouse who signed a buy-sell agreement was bound by the value in a divorce action.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/buy-sell-held-controlling-wife-signed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Signs of Enterprise Goodwill in Professional Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/three-signs-goodwill-professional-practices/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=three-signs-goodwill-professional-practices</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/three-signs-goodwill-professional-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you know whether a professional practice (e.g., medical practice, dental practice, law firm or accounting firm) might have value that can be divided in a a divorce? Here are three signs that a professional practice might have value.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/three-signs-goodwill-professional-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executive Compensation: Excessive Salary or Disguised Dividend?</title>
		<link>http://www.bvsource.com/executive-compensation-excessive-salary-or-disguised-dividend/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=executive-compensation-excessive-salary-or-disguised-dividend</link>
		<comments>http://www.bvsource.com/executive-compensation-excessive-salary-or-disguised-dividend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vertz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[normalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bvsource.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Seventh Circuit held that the salary earned by a CEO of a privately-held business (including a $17 million year-end bonus) was neither excessive nor a disguised dividend.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bvsource.com/executive-compensation-excessive-salary-or-disguised-dividend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
